Comparison

Stroopwafels vs Stroopwafels met roomboter

Overall, Stroopwafels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientStroopwafelsStroopwafels met roomboter
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 459 kcal 458 kcal
Fat 21 g 21 g
Saturated fat 10 g 14 g
Sugars 35.9 g 36 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber 1.5 g 1.5 g
Protein 3.6 g 3.5 g
Additives32
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Stroopwafels has 29% less saturated fat (10 g vs 14 g).
  • Only Stroopwafels met roomboter lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Stroopwafels

Tarwebloem. 29% glucose-fructosestroop, palmvet, suiker, 5% suikerstroop, sojabloem raápolie, zout, rijsmiddel (E500), emulgator (sojalecithine, E471), kaneel, voedingszuur (citroenzuur). Kan melk bevatten.

Stroopwafels met roomboter

stroop 32% (glucose-fructose - stop, suikerstroop), TARWEbloem, roomboter 25% (MILCH), suiker, SOJAbloem, zout, emulgato SOJAlecithine, rijmiddel: E500, kaneel, bourbo vanille, voedingstur: citroenzuur. Allergenen: tarwe (gluten), soja, melk

FAQ

Which is healthier: Stroopwafels or Stroopwafels met roomboter?

Overall, Stroopwafels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stroopwafels met roomboter has fewer calories: 458 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Stroopwafels has less sugar: 35.9 g versus 36 g per 100 g.

More comparisons