Stroopwafels vs Stroopwafels met roomboter
Overall, Stroopwafels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Stroopwafels | Stroopwafels met roomboter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 429 kcal | 458 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 38 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Stroopwafels has 24% less fat (16 g vs 21 g).
- Stroopwafels has 36% less saturated fat (9 g vs 14 g).
- Only Stroopwafels met roomboter lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Stroopwafels
Glucose-fructose syrup, flour, sugar, palm fat, 8% butter (milk), sugar syrup, soya flour, rapeseed oil, salt, emulsifier (soya lecithin, E471), raising agent (E500), cinnamon, acid (citric acid), Bourbon vanilla.
Stroopwafels met roomboter
stroop 32% (glucose-fructose - stop, suikerstroop), TARWEbloem, roomboter 25% (MILCH), suiker, SOJAbloem, zout, emulgato SOJAlecithine, rijmiddel: E500, kaneel, bourbo vanille, voedingstur: citroenzuur. Allergenen: tarwe (gluten), soja, melk
FAQ
Which is healthier: Stroopwafels or Stroopwafels met roomboter?
Overall, Stroopwafels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Stroopwafels has fewer calories: 429 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stroopwafels met roomboter has less sugar: 36 g versus 38 g per 100 g.