Stroopkoep vs Kandijkoek
Overall, Kandijkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Stroopkoep | Kandijkoek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 483 kcal | 470 kcal |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.9 g | 9.6 g |
| Sugars | 31.7 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Sojameel | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kandijkoek has 16% less fat (17.9 g vs 21.2 g).
- Kandijkoek has 31% less saturated fat (9.6 g vs 13.9 g).
- Stroopkoep has 17% less sugar (31.7 g vs 38 g).
- Kandijkoek has 45% more fiber (2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Stroopkoep lists: Milk, Soybeans, Sojameel.
Ingredients
Stroopkoep
_tarwebloem_, glucose-fructosestroop, roomboter 24% (_melk_), suiker, stabilisator (sorbitolen, E422), _sojameel_, weipoeder (_melk_), rijsmiddel (E500), _tarwezetmeel_, mager _melkpoeder_, emulgator (_sojalecithine_), _scharrelei_, zout, gebrande suiker, aroma, specerij (kaneel), natuurlijk Bourbon vanille, kleurstof (carotenen)
Kandijkoek
TARWEbloem, suiker, palmolie, gekaramelliseerde suiker 14,8%, water, glucosestroop, scharrelEIpoeder, kaneelpoeder, rijsmiddel: E500, zout, natuurlijk aroma, emulgator: zonnebloemlecithine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Stroopkoep or Kandijkoek?
Overall, Kandijkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kandijkoek has fewer calories: 470 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stroopkoep has less sugar: 31.7 g versus 38 g per 100 g.