Spelt Fruitkoek vs Kandijkoek
Overall, Spelt Fruitkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spelt Fruitkoek | Kandijkoek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 439 kcal | 470 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 17.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 9.6 g |
| Sugars | 29 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Fiber | 7.2 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spelt Fruitkoek has 18% less saturated fat (7.9 g vs 9.6 g).
- Spelt Fruitkoek has 24% less sugar (29 g vs 38 g).
- Spelt Fruitkoek has 72% more fiber (7.2 g vs 2 g).
- Spelt Fruitkoek has 34% more protein (7.7 g vs 5.1 g).
- Spelt Fruitkoek is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kandijkoek lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Spelt Fruitkoek
volkoren _spelt_meel*, rozijnen*, palmolie* (ongehard), mais* - gerstmoutstroop*, _haver_vlokken*, rijststroop*, cranberries*, appeldiksap*, dadelstroop*, kaneeel*, rijsmiddel (natriumbicarbonaat), zout
Kandijkoek
TARWEbloem, suiker, palmolie, gekaramelliseerde suiker 14,8%, water, glucosestroop, scharrelEIpoeder, kaneelpoeder, rijsmiddel: E500, zout, natuurlijk aroma, emulgator: zonnebloemlecithine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spelt Fruitkoek or Kandijkoek?
Overall, Spelt Fruitkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Spelt Fruitkoek has fewer calories: 439 kcal versus 470 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spelt Fruitkoek has less sugar: 29 g versus 38 g per 100 g.