Roomboter Stroopkoeken vs Stroopkoep
Overall, Roomboter Stroopkoeken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roomboter Stroopkoeken | Stroopkoep |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 465 kcal | 483 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 21.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 13.9 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 31.7 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Sojameel |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roomboter Stroopkoeken has 12% less sugar (28 g vs 31.7 g).
- Only Stroopkoep lists: Sojameel.
Ingredients
Roomboter Stroopkoeken
Tarwebloen, 24% glucose - fructosestroop, 24% roomoter, suiker, oligo - fructose, stabilisator (sorbital, E422), sojameel, weipoeder, rijsmiddel (E500), emulgator (sojalecithine), tarwezetmeel, magere melkpoeder, scharrelei, gekaramelliseerde suiker, zout, kaneel, aroma, Bourbonvanille, kleurstof (caroteen).
Stroopkoep
_tarwebloem_, glucose-fructosestroop, roomboter 24% (_melk_), suiker, stabilisator (sorbitolen, E422), _sojameel_, weipoeder (_melk_), rijsmiddel (E500), _tarwezetmeel_, mager _melkpoeder_, emulgator (_sojalecithine_), _scharrelei_, zout, gebrande suiker, aroma, specerij (kaneel), natuurlijk Bourbon vanille, kleurstof (carotenen)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roomboter Stroopkoeken or Stroopkoep?
Overall, Roomboter Stroopkoeken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roomboter Stroopkoeken has fewer calories: 465 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roomboter Stroopkoeken has less sugar: 28 g versus 31.7 g per 100 g.