Comparison

Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne vs Egg Protein Pot

Overall, Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientStagg Classic Chilli Con Car...Egg Protein Pot
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 130 kcal 477 kcal
Fat 5 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 2.7 g
Sugars 3 g 17 g
Salt 0.9 g 2.2 g
Fiber — 4.6 g
Protein 7 g 25 g
Additives10
AllergensBeefMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has 73% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 477 kcal).
  • Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has 62% less fat (5 g vs 13 g).
  • Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has 82% less sugar (3 g vs 17 g).
  • Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has 60% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Egg Protein Pot has 72% more protein (25 g vs 7 g).
  • Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne lists: Beef.
  • Only Egg Protein Pot lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne

water, beef (23%), beans (kidney and pinto beans) (22%), tomatoes, tomato puree, onion, red and green peppers modified starch, sugar, spices, diced green jalapeno pepper, chill powder, salt, garlic, rapeseed oil. stir halfway microwave the following is a guide only 135043

Egg Protein Pot

Turkey, Salted Jersey Butter (4%)(Butter (Milk), Salt), Cornish Sea Salt(1%), Dextrose.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne or Egg Protein Pot?

Overall, Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 477 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has less sugar: 3 g versus 17 g per 100 g.

More comparisons