Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne vs Cocotte à l'indienne
Overall, Cocotte à l'indienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne
Cocotte à l'indienne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Stagg Classic Chilli Con Car... | Cocotte à l'indienne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 124 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocotte à l'indienne has 58% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Cocotte à l'indienne has 40% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3 g).
- Cocotte à l'indienne has 43% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne has 17% more protein (7 g vs 5.8 g).
- Cocotte à l'indienne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne lists: Beef.
- Only Cocotte à l'indienne lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne
water, beef (23%), beans (kidney and pinto beans) (22%), tomatoes, tomato puree, onion, red and green peppers modified starch, sugar, spices, diced green jalapeno pepper, chill powder, salt, garlic, rapeseed oil. stir halfway microwave the following is a guide only 135043
Cocotte à l'indienne
Haricots blancs* réhydratés 25%, eau, tomate* 15% (dés de tomate*, concentré*), oignons* 14%, carottes*, champignons de Paris*, huile d'olive* vierge extra extraite à froid, tofu* fumé 4,3% [eau, soja*, gélifiant : chlorure de magnésium, tamari* (eau, soja*, sel de mer, saké distillé*, Aspergillus oryzae)], riz*, tofu* 1% (eau, soja*, gélifiant : chlorure de calcium), ail*, sel de mer, épices* 0,9% ,miel*. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Stagg Classic Chilli Con Carne or Cocotte à l'indienne?
Overall, Cocotte à l'indienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocotte à l'indienne has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocotte à l'indienne has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3 g per 100 g.