Comparison

Stabburet Stabbur-Makrell vs Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate

Overall, Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientStabburet Stabbur-MakrellFiletes de Caballa del Sur e...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 256 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 21 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 1.7 g
Sugars 2.9 g 0.7 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber — 0.7 g
Protein 13 g 17.9 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 45% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 256 kcal).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 70% less fat (6.4 g vs 21 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 51% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 76% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 27% more protein (17.9 g vs 13 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Stabburet Stabbur-Makrell

Makrellfilet 71%, tomatsaus 29% (tomat - puré, vann, rapsolje, sukker, salt, antioksidant (askorbinsyre, sitronsyre)),

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate

_Caballa del sur_ (_pescado_) (65%), salsa de tomate (34%) (agua, concentrado de tomate, aceite de girasol) y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Stabburet Stabbur-Makrell or Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate?

Overall, Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons