Spinach, Rocket, Red & Ruby Chard vs Babyspinazie
Overall, Babyspinazie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spinach, Rocket, Red & Ruby... | Babyspinazie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spinach, Rocket, Red & Ruby Chard has 23% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 26 kcal).
- Babyspinazie has 53% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0.9 g).
- Babyspinazie has 24% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.6 g).
Ingredients
Spinach, Rocket, Red & Ruby Chard
Spinach, Wild rocket, Red chard, Ruby red chard.
Babyspinazie
Babyspinazie.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spinach, Rocket, Red & Ruby Chard or Babyspinazie?
Overall, Babyspinazie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Spinach, Rocket, Red & Ruby Chard has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Babyspinazie has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.