Spelt beschuit vs Dinkelzwieback
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spelt beschuit | Dinkelzwieback |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 448 kcal | 411 kcal |
| Fat | 16.5 g | 8.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 8.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 7.6 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 10.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Sesame seeds | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkelzwieback has 47% less fat (8.7 g vs 16.5 g).
- Spelt beschuit has 56% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 5 g).
- Spelt beschuit has 46% less sugar (4.6 g vs 8.5 g).
- Dinkelzwieback is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Spelt beschuit lists: Eggs, Gluten, Sesame seeds.
- Only Dinkelzwieback lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Spelt beschuit
48% speltbloem (tarwe), ei van scharreleieren, gist, 4% speltvlokken (tarwe), glucosestroop, 4% sesamzaad, 4% lijnzaad, suiker, raapzaadolie, tarwegluten, 4% pompoenpitten, 2% zonnebloempitten, gerstemoutmeel, zout
Dinkelzwieback
83% Dinkelmehl*, 8% Butter*, Rohrohrzucker*, Hefe, 0,8% Meersalz, Gewürze*. *aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spelt beschuit or Dinkelzwieback?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkelzwieback has fewer calories: 411 kcal versus 448 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spelt beschuit has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.