Comparison

Spelt beschuit vs Dinkel Zwieback

Overall, Dinkel Zwieback has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSpelt beschuitDinkel Zwieback
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 448 kcal 402 kcal
Fat 16.5 g 6.8 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 4.6 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.8 g 1 g
Fiber 7.6 g 4.3 g
Protein 10.5 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Sesame seedsGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dinkel Zwieback has 10% fewer calories (402 kcal vs 448 kcal).
  • Dinkel Zwieback has 59% less fat (6.8 g vs 16.5 g).
  • Dinkel Zwieback has 68% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Dinkel Zwieback has 52% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Spelt beschuit has 43% more fiber (7.6 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Dinkel Zwieback has 19% more protein (13 g vs 10.5 g).
  • Dinkel Zwieback has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Dinkel Zwieback is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Spelt beschuit lists: Eggs, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Spelt beschuit

48% speltbloem (tarwe), ei van scharreleieren, gist, 4% speltvlokken (tarwe), glucosestroop, 4% sesamzaad, 4% lijnzaad, suiker, raapzaadolie, tarwegluten, 4% pompoenpitten, 2% zonnebloempitten, gerstemoutmeel, zout

Dinkel Zwieback

DINKELMEHL*¹ TYPE 630 (83%), DINKELVOLLKORNSCHROT*¹ 9%, Sonnenblumenöl**, Hefe**, Meersalz, Koriander** *aus Demeter Bio-Landbau **aus biologischer Landwirtschaft ¹Dinkel ist eine WEIZENART Kann Spuren von Sesam enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Spelt beschuit or Dinkel Zwieback?

Overall, Dinkel Zwieback has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dinkel Zwieback has fewer calories: 402 kcal versus 448 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dinkel Zwieback has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons