Spelt beschuit vs Dinkel Zwieback
Overall, Dinkel Zwieback has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spelt beschuit | Dinkel Zwieback |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 448 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 16.5 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 7.6 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Sesame seeds | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dinkel Zwieback has 13% fewer calories (392 kcal vs 448 kcal).
- Dinkel Zwieback has 61% less fat (6.4 g vs 16.5 g).
- Dinkel Zwieback has 73% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Dinkel Zwieback has 54% less sugar (2.1 g vs 4.6 g).
- Spelt beschuit has 34% more fiber (7.6 g vs 5 g).
- Dinkel Zwieback has 13% more protein (12 g vs 10.5 g).
- Dinkel Zwieback has the better Nutri-Score.
- Dinkel Zwieback is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Spelt beschuit lists: Eggs, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Spelt beschuit
48% speltbloem (tarwe), ei van scharreleieren, gist, 4% speltvlokken (tarwe), glucosestroop, 4% sesamzaad, 4% lijnzaad, suiker, raapzaadolie, tarwegluten, 4% pompoenpitten, 2% zonnebloempitten, gerstemoutmeel, zout
Dinkel Zwieback
81% DINKELMEHL Type 630, 11% DINKELVOLLKORNSCHROT, Sonnenblumenöl, Hefe, Meersalz, Koriander
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spelt beschuit or Dinkel Zwieback?
Overall, Dinkel Zwieback has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dinkel Zwieback has fewer calories: 392 kcal versus 448 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dinkel Zwieback has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.