Speck des Alpes vs Spekreepjes Biologisch
Overall, Speck des Alpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Speck des Alpes
Spekreepjes Biologisch
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Speck des Alpes | Spekreepjes Biologisch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.4 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 32 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Speck des Alpes has 34% less fat (21 g vs 32 g).
- Speck des Alpes has 30% less saturated fat (8.4 g vs 12 g).
- Spekreepjes Biologisch has 41% less salt (2.7 g vs 4.5 g).
- Speck des Alpes has 50% more protein (32 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Speck des Alpes
Viande de porc , sel, dextrose , épices, arômes naturels, conservateur
Spekreepjes Biologisch
95% varkensvlees*, zout, dextrose* , antioxidant (ascorbinezuur), zuurteregelaar (natriumcitraat), conserveermiddel (natriumnitriet), kruidenextract, rook
FAQ
Which is healthier: Speck des Alpes or Spekreepjes Biologisch?
Overall, Speck des Alpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Speck des Alpes has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Speck des Alpes has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.