Son de Blé vs Fibra sticks
Overall, Son de Blé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Son de Blé | Fibra sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 218 kcal | 342 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 40 g | 33 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Son de Blé has 36% fewer calories (218 kcal vs 342 kcal).
- Fibra sticks has 40% less fat (3.3 g vs 5.5 g).
- Son de Blé has 35% less sugar (6.5 g vs 10 g).
- Son de Blé has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Son de Blé has 18% more fiber (40 g vs 33 g).
- Son de Blé has the better Nutri-Score.
- Son de Blé is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fibra sticks lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Son de Blé
Blé tendre biologique,
Fibra sticks
Cereales [salvado de trigo (58%), harina integral de trigo], azúcar, sal, vitaminas: niacina (PP), riboflavina (B2), B6, tiamina (B1), ácido fólico (B9), B12, hierro. Puede contener trazas de _soja_, productos _lácteos_ y otros _frutos de cáscara_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Son de Blé or Fibra sticks?
Overall, Son de Blé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Son de Blé has fewer calories: 218 kcal versus 342 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Son de Blé has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 10 g per 100 g.