Natural Wheat Bran vs Fibra sticks
Overall, Natural Wheat Bran has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Natural Wheat Bran | Fibra sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 206 kcal | 342 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 36.4 g | 33 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Natural Wheat Bran has 40% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 342 kcal).
- Fibra sticks has 40% less fat (3.3 g vs 5.5 g).
- Fibra sticks has 33% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Natural Wheat Bran has 62% less sugar (3.8 g vs 10 g).
- Natural Wheat Bran has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Fibra sticks has 19% more protein (16 g vs 13 g).
- Natural Wheat Bran has the better Nutri-Score.
- Natural Wheat Bran is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fibra sticks lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Natural Wheat Bran
Wheat bran
Fibra sticks
Cereales [salvado de trigo (58%), harina integral de trigo], azúcar, sal, vitaminas: niacina (PP), riboflavina (B2), B6, tiamina (B1), ácido fólico (B9), B12, hierro. Puede contener trazas de _soja_, productos _lácteos_ y otros _frutos de cáscara_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Natural Wheat Bran or Fibra sticks?
Overall, Natural Wheat Bran has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Natural Wheat Bran has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 342 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natural Wheat Bran has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 10 g per 100 g.