Natural Wheat Bran vs Salvado trigo integral
Overall, Salvado trigo integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Natural Wheat Bran
Salvado trigo integral
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Natural Wheat Bran | Salvado trigo integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 206 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 36.4 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salvado trigo integral has 16% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 206 kcal).
- Salvado trigo integral has 15% less fat (4.7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Salvado trigo integral has 39% less sugar (2.3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Salvado trigo integral has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Natural Wheat Bran
Wheat bran
Salvado trigo integral
Salvado integral de trigo. Contiene gluten. Puede Centener trazas de sésamo. "S
FAQ
Which is healthier: Natural Wheat Bran or Salvado trigo integral?
Overall, Salvado trigo integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salvado trigo integral has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salvado trigo integral has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.