Snackoliven Olive vs Olive El Bakara
Overall, Snackoliven Olive has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Snackoliven Olive | Olive El Bakara |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 161 kcal |
| Fat | 25.6 g | 15.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 15.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | — |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olive El Bakara has 35% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Olive El Bakara has 39% less fat (15.6 g vs 25.6 g).
- Snackoliven Olive has 79% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 15.6 g).
- Snackoliven Olive has no sugar, while Olive El Bakara has 4.2 g.
- Olive El Bakara has no salt, while Snackoliven Olive has 2 g.
- Snackoliven Olive has 33% more protein (1.5 g vs 1 g).
- Snackoliven Olive has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Snackoliven Olive
91% Oliven, natives Olivenöl extra, Speisesalz, Branntweinessig, Säuerungsmittel: Milchsäure
Olive El Bakara
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Snackoliven Olive or Olive El Bakara?
Overall, Snackoliven Olive has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olive El Bakara has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Snackoliven Olive has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.