Comparison

Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney vs Schezwan Chutney

Overall, Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSmokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutn...Schezwan Chutney
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 178 kcal 176 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 6.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 2 g
Sugars 40.5 g 8 g
Salt 1.1 g 4.9 g
Fiber 2.4 g 0 g
Protein 1.5 g 2.2 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has 93% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2 g).
  • Schezwan Chutney has 80% less sugar (8 g vs 40.5 g).
  • Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has 78% less salt (1.1 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has 100% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Schezwan Chutney has 32% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Schezwan Chutney lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney

Not available.

Schezwan Chutney

Water, Cotton Seed Oil, Sugar, iodised Salt, Chilli, Garlic, Onion, Thickener (INS 1422), Ginger, Acidity Regulator (INS 260), Flavour Enhancer (INS 635), Spices (White Pepper, Schezwan Pepper), Preservatives (INS 202, INS 211), Natural Flavouring Substances. _Contains: Celery. May contain: Wheat, Soy, Nuts, Sesame Seeds, Mustard and Milk._

FAQ

Which is healthier: Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney or Schezwan Chutney?

Overall, Smokey Tomato @ Chilli Chutney has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schezwan Chutney has fewer calories: 176 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schezwan Chutney has less sugar: 8 g versus 40.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons