Slow cooked pulled pork vs Bavarian style ham
Overall, Bavarian style ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Slow cooked pulled pork | Bavarian style ham |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 6 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Pork, Sesame seeds | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bavarian style ham has 31% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Bavarian style ham has 76% less fat (2.4 g vs 9.8 g).
- Bavarian style ham has 76% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4.1 g).
- Bavarian style ham has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Slow cooked pulled pork has 62% less salt (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Bavarian style ham has 24% more protein (21 g vs 16 g).
- Slow cooked pulled pork has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Slow cooked pulled pork lists: Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Slow cooked pulled pork
Pork 84%, water, salt, vegetable oil (rapeseed oil, palm oil), sugar beet extract, apple extract, spices (contains hydrolyzed vegetable (rapeseed, corn) proteins), sucrose, honey, dextrose, spice extracts, smoke flavourings, stabilizers E450, E451, thickeners E412, E407a, E415, yeast extract, flavourings, antioxidant E301. May contain traces of CELERY, MILK (including LACTOSE), CEREALS containing GLUTEN (from WHEAT), MUSTARD, SESAME seeds, SOY
Bavarian style ham
Pork*, Iodised Salt [Salt, Preservative (Sodium Nitrite), Potassium Iodate], Smoked Salt, Stabiliser (Diphosphates), Spice Extracts [Lovage, Pepper], Fenugreek, Onion Powder, Garlic Powder, Leek Extract, Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate). *Made with 100g of pork per 100g of finished product. May contain celery and mustard.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Slow cooked pulled pork or Bavarian style ham?
Overall, Bavarian style ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bavarian style ham has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bavarian style ham has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.