Comparison
Sliced Curly Kale vs Boerenkool
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Curly Kale | Boerenkool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sliced Curly Kale has 27% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 33 kcal).
- Boerenkool has 45% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Boerenkool has 56% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Boerenkool has 40% more fiber (4.7 g vs 2.8 g).
- Boerenkool has 20% more protein (3 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Sliced Curly Kale
Not available.
Boerenkool
boerenkool
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Curly Kale or Boerenkool?
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sliced Curly Kale has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boerenkool has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.