Comparison
Chou frisé vs Boerenkool
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou frisé | Boerenkool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boerenkool has 25% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 44 kcal).
- Boerenkool has 33% less fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chou frisé has no sugar, while Boerenkool has 0.4 g.
- Boerenkool has 15% more fiber (4.7 g vs 4 g).
- Chou frisé has 33% more protein (4.5 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Chou frisé
Chou frisé (Espagne)
Boerenkool
boerenkool
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou frisé or Boerenkool?
Overall, Boerenkool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boerenkool has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chou frisé has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.