Comparison

Skyr vs Nature

Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSkyrNature
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 56 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.6 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 25 g
Fiber 0 g 0.9 g
Protein 9.3 g 4 g
Additives05
AllergensMilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nature has 13% fewer calories (49 kcal vs 56 kcal).
  • Skyr has 78% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Skyr has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Nature has 39% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Skyr has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 25 g).
  • Nature has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Skyr has 57% more protein (9.3 g vs 4 g).
  • Skyr has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Skyr is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Skyr lists: Milk.
  • Only Nature lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Skyr

Yaourt maigre (LAIT)

Nature

water, hulled soya beans (10,7%), sugar, calcium (tricalcium citrate), stabiliser (pectins), acidity regulators (sodium citrates, citric acid), sea salt, flavouring, antioxidants (tocopherol-rich extract, fatty acid esters of ascorbic acid), vitamins (b12, d2), yogurt cultures (s. thermophilus, l. bulgaricus),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Skyr or Nature?

Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nature has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nature has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons