Skuta vs Kisla smetana
Overall, Skuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skuta | Kisla smetana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 149 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skuta has 21% fewer calories (149 kcal vs 188 kcal).
- Skuta has 43% less fat (10.2 g vs 18 g).
- Skuta has 53% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 12 g).
- Skuta has 75% more protein (11.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Kisla smetana has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Skuta
SI-SKUTA/SVEZI POLMASTNI SIR Izdelana iz pasteriziranega mleka. Vsebuje najmanj 35% mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi. HR/BIH-SVJEŽI MASNI SIR Proizveden od pasteriziranog mlijeka. Sadrži najmanje 35 % mliječne masti u suhoj tvari.
Kisla smetana
Kisla smetana z 18 % mlečne maščobe, pasterizirana.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skuta or Kisla smetana?
Overall, Skuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skuta has fewer calories: 149 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kisla smetana has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.