Mileram 22% m.m. vs Skuta
Overall, Skuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mileram 22% m.m. | Skuta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 225 kcal | 149 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 10.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.6 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 11.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skuta has 34% fewer calories (149 kcal vs 225 kcal).
- Skuta has 54% less fat (10.2 g vs 22 g).
- Skuta has 61% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 14.6 g).
- Skuta has 18% less sugar (3.3 g vs 4 g).
- Skuta has 75% more protein (11.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Mileram 22% m.m. has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mileram 22% m.m. lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Mileram 22% m.m.
Pasterizirano vrhnje s 22% mliječne masti, kultura mliječnih bakterija.
Skuta
SI-SKUTA/SVEZI POLMASTNI SIR Izdelana iz pasteriziranega mleka. Vsebuje najmanj 35% mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi. HR/BIH-SVJEŽI MASNI SIR Proizveden od pasteriziranog mlijeka. Sadrži najmanje 35 % mliječne masti u suhoj tvari.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mileram 22% m.m. or Skuta?
Overall, Skuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skuta has fewer calories: 149 kcal versus 225 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Skuta has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.