Skuta vs Sirni namaz classic
Overall, Skuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skuta | Sirni namaz classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 149 kcal | 248 kcal |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 14.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Mleko v prahu |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skuta has 40% fewer calories (149 kcal vs 248 kcal).
- Skuta has 56% less fat (10.2 g vs 23 g).
- Skuta has 61% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 14.6 g).
- Skuta has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Skuta has 37% more protein (11.1 g vs 7 g).
- Sirni namaz classic has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sirni namaz classic lists: Milk, Mleko v prahu.
Ingredients
Skuta
SI-SKUTA/SVEZI POLMASTNI SIR Izdelana iz pasteriziranega mleka. Vsebuje najmanj 35% mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi. HR/BIH-SVJEŽI MASNI SIR Proizveden od pasteriziranog mlijeka. Sadrži najmanje 35 % mliječne masti u suhoj tvari.
Sirni namaz classic
55% sveži _sir_, 25% _smetana_, _maslo_, _mleko v prahu_, jedilna sol, modificirani škrob, stabilizator (guar gumi, gumi iz zrn rožičevca, karagenan), jedilna želatina, sredstvo za uravnavanje kislosti citronska kislina,. Vsebuje najmanj 60 % mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skuta or Sirni namaz classic?
Overall, Skuta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skuta has fewer calories: 149 kcal versus 248 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sirni namaz classic has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.