Kisla smetana vs Sirni namaz classic
Overall, Kisla smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kisla smetana | Sirni namaz classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 133 kcal | 248 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 14.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Mleko v prahu |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kisla smetana has 46% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 248 kcal).
- Kisla smetana has 48% less fat (12 g vs 23 g).
- Kisla smetana has 47% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 14.6 g).
- Kisla smetana has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Sirni namaz classic has 60% more protein (7 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Sirni namaz classic lists: Milk, Mleko v prahu.
Ingredients
Kisla smetana
PASTERIZIRANA IN FERMENTIRANA SMETANA Z 12% MLEČNE MASČOBE
Sirni namaz classic
55% sveži _sir_, 25% _smetana_, _maslo_, _mleko v prahu_, jedilna sol, modificirani škrob, stabilizator (guar gumi, gumi iz zrn rožičevca, karagenan), jedilna želatina, sredstvo za uravnavanje kislosti citronska kislina,. Vsebuje najmanj 60 % mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kisla smetana or Sirni namaz classic?
Overall, Kisla smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kisla smetana has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 248 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sirni namaz classic has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.