Comparison
Kisla smetana vs Kisla smetana
Overall, Kisla smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kisla smetana | Kisla smetana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 133 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kisla smetana has 29% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 188 kcal).
- Kisla smetana has 33% less fat (12 g vs 18 g).
- Kisla smetana has 35% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Kisla smetana
PASTERIZIRANA IN FERMENTIRANA SMETANA Z 12% MLEČNE MASČOBE
Kisla smetana
Kisla smetana z 18 % mlečne maščobe, pasterizirana.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kisla smetana or Kisla smetana?
Overall, Kisla smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kisla smetana has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kisla smetana has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.