Kisla smetana vs Skuta
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kisla smetana | Skuta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 133 kcal | 149 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 10.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 11.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kisla smetana has 11% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 149 kcal).
- Skuta has 15% less fat (10.2 g vs 12 g).
- Skuta has 27% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 7.8 g).
- Skuta has 75% more protein (11.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Kisla smetana has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kisla smetana
PASTERIZIRANA IN FERMENTIRANA SMETANA Z 12% MLEČNE MASČOBE
Skuta
SI-SKUTA/SVEZI POLMASTNI SIR Izdelana iz pasteriziranega mleka. Vsebuje najmanj 35% mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi. HR/BIH-SVJEŽI MASNI SIR Proizveden od pasteriziranog mlijeka. Sadrži najmanje 35 % mliječne masti u suhoj tvari.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kisla smetana or Skuta?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kisla smetana has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 149 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Skuta has less sugar: 3.3 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.