Sirni namaz classic vs Kisla smetana
Overall, Kisla smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sirni namaz classic | Kisla smetana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 248 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.6 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Mleko v prahu | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kisla smetana has 24% fewer calories (188 kcal vs 248 kcal).
- Kisla smetana has 22% less fat (18 g vs 23 g).
- Kisla smetana has 18% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14.6 g).
- Kisla smetana has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Sirni namaz classic has 60% more protein (7 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Sirni namaz classic lists: Milk, Mleko v prahu.
Ingredients
Sirni namaz classic
55% sveži _sir_, 25% _smetana_, _maslo_, _mleko v prahu_, jedilna sol, modificirani škrob, stabilizator (guar gumi, gumi iz zrn rožičevca, karagenan), jedilna želatina, sredstvo za uravnavanje kislosti citronska kislina,. Vsebuje najmanj 60 % mlečne maščobe v suhi snovi.
Kisla smetana
Kisla smetana z 18 % mlečne maščobe, pasterizirana.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sirni namaz classic or Kisla smetana?
Overall, Kisla smetana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kisla smetana has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 248 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sirni namaz classic has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.