Comparison
Sift Figs vs Soft figs
Overall, Sift Figs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sift Figs | Soft figs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 48.6 g | 48.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft figs has 16% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Sift Figs has no saturated fat, while Soft figs has 1.3 g.
- Sift Figs has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sift Figs
figs whole dried rehydrated (contains 35% moisture content maximum), conservative : sorbate of potassium, 0,8€/100g
Soft figs
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sift Figs or Soft figs?
Overall, Sift Figs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft figs has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sift Figs has less sugar: 48.6 g versus 48.6 g per 100 g.