Sift Figs vs Figues sèches type layer
Overall, Figues sèches type layer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sift Figs | Figues sèches type layer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 48.6 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 6.9 g | 9.7 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Figues sèches type layer has 40% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Sift Figs has no saturated fat, while Figues sèches type layer has 0.4 g.
- Figues sèches type layer has 29% more fiber (9.7 g vs 6.9 g).
Ingredients
Sift Figs
figs whole dried rehydrated (contains 35% moisture content maximum), conservative : sorbate of potassium, 0,8€/100g
Figues sèches type layer
Figues sèches (catégorie 1)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sift Figs or Figues sèches type layer?
Overall, Figues sèches type layer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sift Figs has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sift Figs has less sugar: 48.6 g versus 49 g per 100 g.