Semola di grano duro biologica vs Farina di grano duro per pasta
Overall, Semola di grano duro biologica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Semola di grano duro biologica
Farina di grano duro per pasta
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Semola di grano duro biologi... | Farina di grano duro per pas... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 336 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 11.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Semola di grano duro biologica has 40% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Farina di grano duro per pasta has 49% more fiber (6.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Semola di grano duro biologica has 12% more protein (13 g vs 11.5 g).
Ingredients
Semola di grano duro biologica
semola di grano_ duro
Farina di grano duro per pasta
FARINA di Grano duro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Semola di grano duro biologica or Farina di grano duro per pasta?
Overall, Semola di grano duro biologica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farina di grano duro per pasta has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Semola di grano duro biologica has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.