Comparison

Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips vs Rookamandelen

Overall, Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSea Salt Kettle Cooked Potat...Rookamandelen
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 536 kcal 635 kcal
Fat 32.1 g 55 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 4.5 g
Sugars 3.6 g 4 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.2 g
Fiber 3.6 g 8 g
Protein 7.1 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 16% fewer calories (536 kcal vs 635 kcal).
  • Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 42% less fat (32.1 g vs 55 g).
  • Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 21% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 11% less sugar (3.6 g vs 4 g).
  • Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 32% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Rookamandelen has 55% more fiber (8 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Rookamandelen has 71% more protein (25 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Rookamandelen has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Rookamandelen lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Potatoes, vegetable oil (corn, canola, and/or sunflower oil), sea salt.

Rookamandelen

92% amandel, zonnebloemolie, rookaroma, zout, natuurlijk aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips or Rookamandelen?

Overall, Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has fewer calories: 536 kcal versus 635 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons