Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers vs Maria
Overall, Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sea Salt Croccantini Cracker... | Maria |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 412 kcal | 417 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 11.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 8.3 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 8 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has 75% less fat (2.9 g vs 11.7 g).
- Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has no sugar, while Maria has 8.3 g.
- Maria has 29% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Maria has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has 43% more protein (11.8 g vs 6.7 g).
- Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Maria lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers
Enriched flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), extra virgin olive oil, sea salt.
Maria
Wheat flour 67%, sweetener (maltitol), vegetable oil (high oleic sunflower oil) 10%, oligofructose, sodium bicarbonate, ammonium bicarbonate, salt, emulsifier (soya lecithin), flavors, antioxidant (sodium metabisulfite). May contain traces of sesame and milk.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers or Maria?
Overall, Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has fewer calories: 412 kcal versus 417 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sea Salt Croccantini Crackers has less sugar: 0 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.