Comparison

Schweineschmalz vs Holsteiner Liesel

Overall, Holsteiner Liesel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchweineschmalzHolsteiner Liesel
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 897 kcal 676 kcal
Fat 92 g 75 g
Saturated fat 92 g 25 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3.9 g
Salt 0 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.5 g 0.9 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Holsteiner Liesel has 25% fewer calories (676 kcal vs 897 kcal).
  • Holsteiner Liesel has 18% less fat (75 g vs 92 g).
  • Holsteiner Liesel has 73% less saturated fat (25 g vs 92 g).
  • Schweineschmalz has 87% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Schweineschmalz has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Holsteiner Liesel has 44% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Schweineschmalz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Holsteiner Liesel lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Schweineschmalz

Schweineschmalz, Antioxidationsmittel: Extrakt aus Rosmarin.

Holsteiner Liesel

66,0% pflanzliche Fette (Palmfett, Palmkernfett), 15,0% Rapsöl, 9,0% Zwiebeln, 5,0% getrocknete Apfelstücke, 2,0% getrocknete Zwiebeln, Salz, Maltodextrin, Hefeextrakt, Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze (mit Sellerie), Thymian, Rosmarin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schweineschmalz or Holsteiner Liesel?

Overall, Holsteiner Liesel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Holsteiner Liesel has fewer calories: 676 kcal versus 897 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schweineschmalz has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons