Schmalz vs Schweineschmalz
Overall, Schweineschmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmalz | Schweineschmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 833 kcal | 897 kcal |
| Fat | 91 g | 92 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 92 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmalz has 65% less saturated fat (32 g vs 92 g).
- Schweineschmalz has 78% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Schweineschmalz has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.1 g).
- Schweineschmalz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Schmalz
Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Röstzwiebeln 9.2% (Zwiebeln, Palmfett), Jodsalz, Apfel getrocknet 0.6%, Aromen
Schweineschmalz
Schweineschmalz, Antioxidationsmittel: Extrakt aus Rosmarin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmalz or Schweineschmalz?
Overall, Schweineschmalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmalz has fewer calories: 833 kcal versus 897 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schweineschmalz has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.