Saindoux pur porc vs Schmalz
Overall, Saindoux pur porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saindoux pur porc | Schmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 900 kcal | 833 kcal |
| Fat | 100 g | 91 g |
| Saturated fat | 39.7 g | 32 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmalz has 19% less saturated fat (32 g vs 39.7 g).
- Saindoux pur porc has no sugar, while Schmalz has 2.3 g.
- Saindoux pur porc has no salt, while Schmalz has 1.1 g.
- Schmalz has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Saindoux pur porc has the better Nutri-Score.
- Saindoux pur porc is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Saindoux pur porc
Graisse de porc, saindoux, , antioxydant : extrait riche en tocophérols
Schmalz
Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Röstzwiebeln 9.2% (Zwiebeln, Palmfett), Jodsalz, Apfel getrocknet 0.6%, Aromen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saindoux pur porc or Schmalz?
Overall, Saindoux pur porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmalz has fewer calories: 833 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saindoux pur porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.