Schmalz vs Holsteiner Liesel
Overall, Holsteiner Liesel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmalz | Holsteiner Liesel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 833 kcal | 676 kcal |
| Fat | 91 g | 75 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 25 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Holsteiner Liesel has 19% fewer calories (676 kcal vs 833 kcal).
- Holsteiner Liesel has 18% less fat (75 g vs 91 g).
- Holsteiner Liesel has 22% less saturated fat (25 g vs 32 g).
- Schmalz has 41% less sugar (2.3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Schmalz has 39% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Holsteiner Liesel lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Schmalz
Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Röstzwiebeln 9.2% (Zwiebeln, Palmfett), Jodsalz, Apfel getrocknet 0.6%, Aromen
Holsteiner Liesel
66,0% pflanzliche Fette (Palmfett, Palmkernfett), 15,0% Rapsöl, 9,0% Zwiebeln, 5,0% getrocknete Apfelstücke, 2,0% getrocknete Zwiebeln, Salz, Maltodextrin, Hefeextrakt, Kartoffelstärke, Gewürze (mit Sellerie), Thymian, Rosmarin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmalz or Holsteiner Liesel?
Overall, Holsteiner Liesel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Holsteiner Liesel has fewer calories: 676 kcal versus 833 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schmalz has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.