Schmalz vs Smalec wyborowy
Overall, Smalec wyborowy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmalz | Smalec wyborowy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 833 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 91 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 48 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmalz has 33% less saturated fat (32 g vs 48 g).
- Smalec wyborowy has no sugar, while Schmalz has 2.3 g.
- Smalec wyborowy has no salt, while Schmalz has 1.1 g.
- Schmalz has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Smalec wyborowy has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schmalz
Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Röstzwiebeln 9.2% (Zwiebeln, Palmfett), Jodsalz, Apfel getrocknet 0.6%, Aromen
Smalec wyborowy
Tłuszcz wieprzowy topiony jadalny
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmalz or Smalec wyborowy?
Overall, Smalec wyborowy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmalz has fewer calories: 833 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smalec wyborowy has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.