Schmalz vs Grammel Schmalz
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schmalz | Grammel Schmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 833 kcal | 853 kcal |
| Fat | 91 g | 95 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 39 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmalz has 18% less saturated fat (32 g vs 39 g).
- Grammel Schmalz has 78% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Schmalz has 27% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Grammel Schmalz has 71% more protein (2.4 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Schmalz
Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Röstzwiebeln 9.2% (Zwiebeln, Palmfett), Jodsalz, Apfel getrocknet 0.6%, Aromen
Grammel Schmalz
Grammelschmalzzubereitung Zutaten: Schweineschmalz 83%, Grammeln 13%, Knoblauchpaste Knoblauch, Salz), Speisesalz, Gewürze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schmalz or Grammel Schmalz?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmalz has fewer calories: 833 kcal versus 853 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grammel Schmalz has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.