Smalec wyborowy vs Grammel Schmalz
Overall, Smalec wyborowy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Smalec wyborowy | Grammel Schmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 900 kcal | 853 kcal |
| Fat | 100 g | 95 g |
| Saturated fat | 48 g | 39 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grammel Schmalz has 19% less saturated fat (39 g vs 48 g).
- Smalec wyborowy has no sugar, while Grammel Schmalz has 0.5 g.
- Smalec wyborowy has no salt, while Grammel Schmalz has 1.5 g.
- Grammel Schmalz has 100% more protein (2.4 g vs 0 g).
- Smalec wyborowy has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Smalec wyborowy
Tłuszcz wieprzowy topiony jadalny
Grammel Schmalz
Grammelschmalzzubereitung Zutaten: Schweineschmalz 83%, Grammeln 13%, Knoblauchpaste Knoblauch, Salz), Speisesalz, Gewürze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Smalec wyborowy or Grammel Schmalz?
Overall, Smalec wyborowy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grammel Schmalz has fewer calories: 853 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smalec wyborowy has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.