Snow cap lard vs Schmalz
Overall, Snow cap lard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Snow cap lard | Schmalz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 923 kcal | 833 kcal |
| Fat | 100 g | 91 g |
| Saturated fat | 38.5 g | 32 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schmalz has 17% less saturated fat (32 g vs 38.5 g).
- Snow cap lard has no sugar, while Schmalz has 2.3 g.
- Snow cap lard has no salt, while Schmalz has 1.1 g.
- Schmalz has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Snow cap lard has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Snow cap lard
Snow cap lard.
Schmalz
Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps), pflanzliches Fett (Palm), Röstzwiebeln 9.2% (Zwiebeln, Palmfett), Jodsalz, Apfel getrocknet 0.6%, Aromen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Snow cap lard or Schmalz?
Overall, Snow cap lard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schmalz has fewer calories: 833 kcal versus 923 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Snow cap lard has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.