Comparison
Schweineschmalz vs Smalec wyborowy
Overall, Smalec wyborowy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schweineschmalz | Smalec wyborowy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 897 kcal | 900 kcal |
| Fat | 92 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 92 g | 48 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smalec wyborowy has 48% less saturated fat (48 g vs 92 g).
- Smalec wyborowy has no sugar, while Schweineschmalz has 0.5 g.
- Schweineschmalz has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Smalec wyborowy has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Schweineschmalz
Schweineschmalz, Antioxidationsmittel: Extrakt aus Rosmarin.
Smalec wyborowy
Tłuszcz wieprzowy topiony jadalny
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schweineschmalz or Smalec wyborowy?
Overall, Smalec wyborowy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schweineschmalz has fewer calories: 897 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smalec wyborowy has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.