Comparison

Schinkenwurst vs Delikates Lachs-Schinken

Overall, Delikates Lachs-Schinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchinkenwurstDelikates Lachs-Schinken
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 280 kcal 117 kcal
Fat 26 g 2 g
Saturated fat 17 g 1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.1 g 3.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 11 g 24 g
Additives53
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Delikates Lachs-Schinken has 58% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 280 kcal).
  • Delikates Lachs-Schinken has 92% less fat (2 g vs 26 g).
  • Delikates Lachs-Schinken has 94% less saturated fat (1 g vs 17 g).
  • Schinkenwurst has 45% less salt (2.1 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Delikates Lachs-Schinken has 54% more protein (24 g vs 11 g).

Ingredients

Schinkenwurst

Schweinefleisch* 74%, Wasser, Speck*, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Konservierungsstoff (Natriumnitrit), Stabilisatoren (Natriumcitrate, Diphosphate), Dextrose, Gewürze, Säureregulatoren (Kaliumlactat Kaliumacetat), Antioxidationsmittel (Ascorbinsäure), Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), Gewürzextrakte, Glukosesirup. *QS-Ware Kann Spuren von Senf enthalten.

Delikates Lachs-Schinken

Schweinefleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Konservierungsstoff Natriumnitrit, Zucker, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel Natriumascorbat, Gewürzextrakte, Stabilisator Diphosphate, Rauch.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schinkenwurst or Delikates Lachs-Schinken?

Overall, Delikates Lachs-Schinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Delikates Lachs-Schinken has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 280 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schinkenwurst has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons