Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90 vs Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack
Overall, Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90
Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sardinilla en escabeche rr-9... | Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 214 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 13.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90 has 16% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack has 47% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90 has 12% more protein (25 g vs 22 g).
- Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90
Sardinas (Sardina pilchardus), aceite de girasol (18%), vinagre de vino (contiene sulfitos), agua, especias, sal.
Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack
Sardinas (Sardina pilchardus walbaum), aceite de girasol (12,9%), vinagre de vino, sal, pimentón dulce (0,8%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90 or Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack?
Overall, Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack has fewer calories: 210 kcal versus 214 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sardinilla en escabeche rr-90 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.