Sardina en escabeche rr-125 vs Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sardina en escabeche rr-125 | Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 210 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 13.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Sardina en escabeche rr-125
Sardinas (Sardina pilchardus walbaum), aceite de girasol (12,9%), vinagre de vino, sal, pimenton dulce (0,8%)
Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack
Sardinas (Sardina pilchardus walbaum), aceite de girasol (12,9%), vinagre de vino, sal, pimentón dulce (0,8%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sardina en escabeche rr-125 or Sardinas En Escabeche Bipack?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sardina en escabeche rr-125 has fewer calories: 210 kcal versus 210 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sardina en escabeche rr-125 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.