Sardines au naturel vs Filets de maquereaux au naturel
Overall, Sardines au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sardines au naturel
Filets de maquereaux au naturel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sardines au naturel | Filets de maquereaux au natu... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 137 kcal | 215 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sardines au naturel has 36% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 215 kcal).
- Sardines au naturel has 67% less fat (5 g vs 15 g).
- Sardines au naturel has 59% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Sardines au naturel has 13% more protein (23 g vs 20 g).
- Sardines au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sardines au naturel
Sardines - eau - sel.
Filets de maquereaux au naturel
Filets de maquereaux 59% - eau - sel - épices et plantes aromatiques. Traces de lait, moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sardines au naturel or Filets de maquereaux au naturel?
Overall, Sardines au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sardines au naturel has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sardines au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.