Comparison

Thon albacore au naturel vs Filets de maquereaux au naturel

Overall, Thon albacore au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon albacore au naturelFilets de maquereaux au natu...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 117 kcal 215 kcal
Fat 1 g 15 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 3.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 27 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thon albacore au naturel has 46% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 215 kcal).
  • Thon albacore au naturel has 93% less fat (1 g vs 15 g).
  • Thon albacore au naturel has 86% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Thon albacore au naturel has 26% more protein (27 g vs 20 g).
  • Thon albacore au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Thon albacore au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Thon albacore au naturel

Thon albacore - eau-sel

Filets de maquereaux au naturel

Filets de maquereaux 59% - eau - sel - épices et plantes aromatiques. Traces de lait, moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon albacore au naturel or Filets de maquereaux au naturel?

Overall, Thon albacore au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thon albacore au naturel has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Thon albacore au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons