Comparison

Salz-Brezeln vs Prezel Bites

Overall, Salz-Brezeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalz-BrezelnPrezel Bites
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 399 kcal 492 kcal
Fat 8.5 g 24 g
Saturated fat 4.3 g 2.3 g
Sugars 2.5 g 6 g
Salt 9.4 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 2.6 g
Protein 11 g 8.3 g
Additives35
AllergensGlutenGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salz-Brezeln has 19% fewer calories (399 kcal vs 492 kcal).
  • Salz-Brezeln has 65% less fat (8.5 g vs 24 g).
  • Prezel Bites has 47% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Salz-Brezeln has 58% less sugar (2.5 g vs 6 g).
  • Prezel Bites has 84% less salt (1.5 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Salz-Brezeln has 25% more protein (11 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Prezel Bites has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Salz-Brezeln is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Prezel Bites lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Salz-Brezeln

“Weizenmehl“, Rapsöl, Salz, Meersalz, Hefe, “Gerstenmalzextrakt“, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Säureregulator: Natriumhydroxid.

Prezel Bites

Weizenmehl (68%), Sonnenblumenöl (19,8 %), Maltodextrin, Speisesalz, Zucker, Reismehl, Buttermilchpulver, Cheddarpulver (0,5 %), Käsepulver (0,5%), Gewürze, Hefe, Emulgator: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Säureregulator (Calciumphosphate, Natriumphosphat, Natriumhydroxid), Farbstoff: Paprikaextrakt. Produkt kann Spuren von Sesam enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salz-Brezeln or Prezel Bites?

Overall, Salz-Brezeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salz-Brezeln has fewer calories: 399 kcal versus 492 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salz-Brezeln has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons