Comparison

Salade russe vs Ensaladilla suave

Overall, Salade russe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade russeEnsaladilla suave
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 56 kcal 245 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 22 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 2.5 g
Sugars 1 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber 3.5 g —
Protein 2.5 g 1 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade russe has 77% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 245 kcal).
  • Salade russe has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 22 g).
  • Salade russe has 80% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Salade russe has 38% less sugar (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Salade russe has 60% more protein (2.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Salade russe has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Salade russe is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Ensaladilla suave lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Salade russe

eau, pommes de terre, carottes, petit pois, haricots, sel de cuisine iodé.

Ensaladilla suave

Patata (52,6%), salsa (aceite de girasol, yema de huevo (yema de huevo pasteurizada y sal), agua, jarabe de azúcares (sacarosa, dextrosa y agua), aceite de oliva virgen, vinagre de vino blanco, aroma, zumo de limón, conservadores: sorbato potásico y benzoato sódico, sal, estabilizante: goma xantana), zanahoria (14,1%), guisante (11,6%). Puede contener trazas de gluten, granos de sésamo, pescado, soja, crustáceos, productos lácteos, frutos de cáscara, mostaza y sulfitos.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade russe or Ensaladilla suave?

Overall, Salade russe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade russe has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade russe has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons